Henlow v. Leonard

New York Supreme Court

Henlow v. Leonard

7 Johns. 200

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1810

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 7 Johns. 200 (Henlow v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henlow v. Leonard, 7 Johns. 200 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

. Per Curiam.

There is no question in this case as to the justice and merits of the verdict. The plaintiff in error contends that there was an irregularity in the justice’s going with the witness to the jury, at their request. But as this appears to have been done openly, after notice to the parties, and as we may fairly presume, in their presence, there was no ground of complaint. The case of Thayer v. Van Vleet, (5 Johns. Rep. 111.) bears strongly on this point. We are of opinion that the judgment ought to be affirmed.

■ Judgment affirmed.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

. Per Curiam.

There is no question in this case as to the justice and merits of the verdict. The plaintiff in error contends that there was an irregularity in the justice’s going with the witness to the jury, at their request. But as this appears to have been done openly, after notice to the parties, and as we may fairly presume, in their presence, there was no ground of complaint. The case of Thayer v. Van Vleet, (5 Johns. Rep. 111.) bears strongly on this point. We are of opinion that the judgment ought to be affirmed.

■ Judgment affirmed.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Johns. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henlow-v-leonard-nysupct-1810.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack