Henley v. State

100 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 681
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 24, 1924
Docket4 Div. 978.
StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 924 (Henley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henley v. State, 100 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 681 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was put to trial upon an indictment which charged him with the offense of assault with intent to murder one Riley A. Franklin. He was convicted of an assault and battery, the jury assessing a fine against him of $100. Failing to pay the fine and cost, or to confess judgment therefor, he was sentenced to hard labor for the county as required by law, and the court also sentenced him to two months’ additional hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction he appealed to this court. There is no bill of exceptions, the appeal being upon the record proper. The record has been examined, and is without error. The proceedings appear therein to be regular in all respects. Let the judgment stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henley-v-state-alactapp-1924.