Henley v. State

100 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 681
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Ala. App. 307
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 24, 1924·No. 4 Div. 978.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was put to trial upon an indictment which charged him with the offense of assault with intent to murder one Riley A. Franklin. He was convicted of an assault and battery, the jury assessing a fine against him of $100. Failing to pay the fine and cost, or to confess judgment therefor, he was sentenced to hard labor for the county as required by law, and the court also sentenced him to two months’ additional hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction he appealed to this court. There is no bill of exceptions, the appeal being upon the record proper. The record has been examined, and is without error. The proceedings appear therein to be regular in all respects. Let the judgment stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henley v. State, 100 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 681 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

100 So. 924 (Henley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.