Henley v. Paxton

Ohio Supreme Court

Henley v. Paxton

145 N.E. 33, 110 Ohio St. 670, 110 Ohio St. (N.S.) 670, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 322

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 3, 1924

Docket18352

StatusPublished

This text of 145 N.E. 33 (Henley v. Paxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henley v. Paxton, 145 N.E. 33, 110 Ohio St. 670, 110 Ohio St. (N.S.) 670, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 322 (Ohio 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on the authority of Bashore v. Brown, Treas., 108 Ohio St., 18, and City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Beck, ante, 82.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Hay and Allen, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on the authority of Bashore v. Brown, Treas., 108 Ohio St., 18, and City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Beck, ante, 82.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Hay and Allen, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 N.E. 33, 110 Ohio St. 670, 110 Ohio St. (N.S.) 670, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henley-v-paxton-ohio-1924.