Henley v. HERSCHELMAN
This text of 737 N.W.2d 761 (Henley v. HERSCHELMAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Britney Joanne HENLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Fred HERSCHELMAN and Stacey Herschelman, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 2, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. We further ORDER that the proceedings in the Oakland Circuit Court are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
737 N.W.2d 761, 480 Mich. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henley-v-herschelman-mich-2007.