Henley v. Barnes

Fourth Circuit

Henley v. Barnes

203 F. App'x 440

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 18, 2006·No. No. 06-6610·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Vernon Lamont Henley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henley v. Barnes, No. 7:05-cv-00663-jlk, 2006 WL 758828 (W.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Vernon Lamont Henley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henley v. Barnes, No. 7:05-cv-00663-jlk, 2006 WL 758828 (W.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Henley v. Barnes, 203 F. App'x 440 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

203 F. App'x 440 (Henley v. Barnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related