Henley & Co. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 296, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3566
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 26, 1969
DocketC.D. 3748
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 296 (Henley & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henley & Co. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 296, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3566 (cusc 1969).

Opinion

Watson, Judge:

The subject importations, described on the invoices as estrogenic substances or natural estrogenic substances, and covered by the protests enumerated in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision herein, were classified by the appropriate customs officials as synthetic hormones, under item 437.56, Tariff Schedules of the United States, and were assessed with duty at the rate of 10.5 percent ad valorem.

It is the contention of plaintiff that said importations should properly have been classified as natural hormones, not artificially mixed, under item 437.58 of the schedules, for which duty at the rate of 3 percent ad valorem is provided.

By a Submission on Agreed Statement of Facts of the parties hereto it has been agreed that the imported items marked “A” and initialed E.C.A. by Import Specialist Edward C. Alfano on the invoices accompanying the entries covered by said protests consist of natural hormones, not artificially mixed.

Upon the Submission on Agreed Statement of Facts, we hold that the importations marked and initialed as aforesaid should properly have been classified as natural hormones, not artificially mixed, under item 437.58, Tariff Schedules of the United States, and subjected to duty at the rate of 3 percent ad valorem. That claim in the protests is therefore sustained. As to all other importations and all other claims, the protests are overruled.

It is hereby Adjudged and Ordered: that the Regional Commissioner of Customs at the port of New York will reliquidate the entries accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Cust. Ct. 296, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henley-co-v-united-states-cusc-1969.