Henley, Ben Lee
This text of Henley, Ben Lee (Henley, Ben Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,577-01
EX PARTE BEN LEE HENLEY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W11-61328-L(A) IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 5 FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unlawful
possession of a firearm and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals
affirmed his conviction. Henley v. State, No. 05-13-00053-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas June 5, 2013)
(not designated for publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that counsel rendered ineffective assistance. On
June 10, 2014, the trial court entered a timely order designating issues. Applicant has alleged facts
that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte 2
Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts
are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the
trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to respond
to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out
in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its
personal recollection. Id.
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in response to Applicant’s
claims. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it
deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: January 28, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henley, Ben Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henley-ben-lee-texcrimapp-2015.