Henkel v. State
709 So. 2d 130, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2274, 1998 WL 113570
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 1998
DocketNo. 96-3313
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 709 So. 2d 130 (Henkel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Henkel v. State, 709 So. 2d 130, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2274, 1998 WL 113570 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
Reversed. See Vazquez v. State, 700 So.2d 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), rev. granted, 705 So.2d 902 (Fla.1998). As we said in Vazquez, the standard jury instruction on entrapment does not comport with the dictates of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993). That was the jury instruction given in this case and, as we did in Vazquez, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Miller v. State
723 So. 2d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
709 So. 2d 130, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2274, 1998 WL 113570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henkel-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.