Henkel v. State
709 So. 2d 130, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2274, 1998 WL 113570
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1998·No. No. 96-3313·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Reversed. See Vazquez v. State, 700 So.2d 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), rev. granted, 705 So.2d 902 (Fla.1998). As we said in Vazquez, the standard jury instruction on entrapment does not comport with the dictates of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993). That was the jury instruction given in this case and, as we did in Vazquez, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henkel v. State, 709 So. 2d 130, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2274, 1998 WL 113570 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
709 So. 2d 130 (Henkel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. State
723 So. 2d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)