Henke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Henke v. State

686 So. 2d 11, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4555, 1996 WL 210895

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 1, 1996

DocketNo. 94-03893

StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 11 (Henke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henke v. State, 686 So. 2d 11, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4555, 1996 WL 210895 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words “at your own expense” from [12]*12condition 10. Luhy v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed as modified.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words “at your own expense” from [12]*12condition 10. Luhy v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed as modified.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

686 So. 2d 11, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4555, 1996 WL 210895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henke-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack