Henick v. Mancini
This text of 523 A.2d 1391 (Henick v. Mancini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
On appeal from the summary judgment for Charles Mancini entered by the Superi- or Court, Cumberland County, James J. and Maryann B. Henick contend that their claim for damages allegedly caused by Mancini’s negligent operation of a snowplow in the scope of his employment with the State was filed within the six-year limitation set forth in 14 M.R.S.A. § 752 (1980) and that the court erred in holding the action barred by the two-year limitation set forth in 14 M.R.S.A. § 8110 (1980). By an evenly divided court we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
523 A.2d 1391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henick-v-mancini-me-1987.