Henel v. D'Amico

143 A.D.2d 505, 533 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10711

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed with costs. Memorandum: Petitioner seeks review of the determination of the Erie County Pistol Licensing Officer revoking his pistol license. The officer’s determination revoking the license because of a certain incident "demonstrating the careless and reckless use and possession of a firearm” is supported by petitioner’s own version of the incident, even without reference to the police report, and was a proper exercise of the officer’s discretion (Matter of Marlow v Buckley, 105 AD2d 1160). We further find that, also based on petitioner’s own version of events, he was given an adequate opportunity to appear with his attorney to rebut the charges (Matter of St.Oharra v Colluci, 67 AD2d 1104), and he had adequate notice of the hearing. (Article 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henel v. D'Amico, 143 A.D.2d 505, 533 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

143 A.D.2d 505 (Henel v. D'Amico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St.-Oharra v. Colucci
67 A.D.2d 1104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Marlow v. Buckley
105 A.D.2d 1160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)