Henegan v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America
This text of 63 Pa. Super. 616 (Henegan v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The questions raised by this appeal were solely, for the consideration of the jury. ‘The point submitted by the defendant that “under all the pleadings, and all the evidence the verdict should be for the defendant” was properly refused, and the conflicting testimony was fairly submitted' in an adequate charge, which, taken with the opinion of the learned trial judge, in refusing a new trial, and for judgment non obstante veredicto, fully answers the argument presented ,by the appellant.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Pa. Super. 616, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henegan-v-colonial-life-insurance-co-of-america-pasuperct-1916.