Hendryx v. Perkins
116 F. 1020, 52 C.C.A. 684, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4397
Opinion
Having examined the petition for a rehearing which the appellee, Perkins, on April 29, 1902, moved for leave to file, the mandate then having issued, it is our determination that leave should not be granted. Judge ALDRICH, viewing the motion as addressed to the judges joining in the opinion of the court, takes no action thereon. Leave to the appellee to file petition for a rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hendryx v. Perkins, 116 F. 1020, 52 C.C.A. 684, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4397 (1st Cir. 1902).
116 F. 1020 (Hendryx v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cobban v. Conklin
208 F. 231 (Ninth Circuit, 1913)