Hendry v. Hendry

Oregon Supreme Court

Hendry v. Hendry

171 P. 1051, 88 Or. 321, 1918 Ore. LEXIS 37

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 1918·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

McBRIDE, C. J.

1. In these cases a recital of the testimony is worse than valueless, serving only to spread upon the record the details of domestic discord, of which the least said the better. The testimony is contradictory, and as the trial judge had the witnesses before him he was much better able to appraise the value of the testimony than we. Upon the whole, we are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the decree, and it is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Moore, McCamant and Bean, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McBRIDE, C. J.

1. In these cases a recital of the testimony is worse than valueless, serving only to spread upon the record the details of domestic discord, of which the least said the better. The testimony is contradictory, and as the trial judge had the witnesses before him he was much better able to appraise the value of the testimony than we. Upon the whole, we are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the decree, and it is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Moore, McCamant and Bean, JJ., concur.

Hendry v. Hendry, 171 P. 1051, 88 Or. 321, 1918 Ore. LEXIS 37 (Or. 1918).

Pincite

171 P. 1051 (Hendry v. Hendry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related