Hendry v. Hendry

Oregon Supreme Court

Hendry v. Hendry

171 P. 1051, 88 Or. 321, 1918 Ore. LEXIS 37

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedApril 9, 1918

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 171 P. 1051 (Hendry v. Hendry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hendry v. Hendry, 171 P. 1051, 88 Or. 321, 1918 Ore. LEXIS 37 (Or. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

McBRIDE, C. J.

1. In these cases a recital of the testimony is worse than valueless, serving only to spread upon the record the details of domestic discord, of which the least said the better. The testimony is contradictory, and as the trial judge had the witnesses before him he was much better able to appraise the value of the testimony than we. Upon the whole, we are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the decree, and it is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Moore, McCamant and Bean, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McBRIDE, C. J.

1. In these cases a recital of the testimony is worse than valueless, serving only to spread upon the record the details of domestic discord, of which the least said the better. The testimony is contradictory, and as the trial judge had the witnesses before him he was much better able to appraise the value of the testimony than we. Upon the whole, we are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the decree, and it is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Moore, McCamant and Bean, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 P. 1051, 88 Or. 321, 1918 Ore. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendry-v-hendry-or-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack