Hendry v. Georgelas Group, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Hendry v. Georgelas Group, Inc.

603 F. App'x 222

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 21, 2015·No. No. 15-1161·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ernest S. Hendry, Jr., and Judith V. Hendry appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action on statute of limitations grounds. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. [223] Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hendry v. The Georgelas Group, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-01455-JCC-TCB, 2015 WL 268951 (E.D.Va. Jan. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ernest S. Hendry, Jr., and Judith V. Hendry appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action on statute of limitations grounds. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. [223] Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hendry v. The Georgelas Group, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-01455-JCC-TCB, 2015 WL 268951 (E.D.Va. Jan. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hendry v. Georgelas Group, Inc., 603 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

603 F. App'x 222 (Hendry v. Georgelas Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.