Hendrix v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hendrix v. State

1920 OK CR 209, 193 P. 48, 18 Okla. Crim. 709, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 193

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 12, 1920

DocketNo. A-3567.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 209 (Hendrix v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hendrix v. State, 1920 OK CR 209, 193 P. 48, 18 Okla. Crim. 709, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 193 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on an information charging that he did unlawfully furnish to one Wilburn Thompson one pint of intoxicating liquor, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and pay a fine of $50. From the judgment an appeal was taken by filing a duly certified transcript of the record proper in this court on June 12. 1919. No brief has been filed, and no appearance made on behalf of the plaintiff in error, when the ease was called for final submission. The motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on an information charging that he did unlawfully furnish to one Wilburn Thompson one pint of intoxicating liquor, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and pay a fine of $50. From the judgment an appeal was taken by filing a duly certified transcript of the record proper in this court on June 12. 1919. No brief has been filed, and no appearance made on behalf of the plaintiff in error, when the ease was called for final submission. The motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 209, 193 P. 48, 18 Okla. Crim. 709, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrix-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.