Hendrix v. State
11 S.E.2d 51, 63 Ga. App. 304, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 78
Opinion
The accused was tried on an indictment charging him with rape, and was convicted of an assault with intent to rape. His motion for new trial (consisting of the general grounds only) was overruled, and he excepted to that judgment. The evidence for the State amply authorized the verdict. The defendant did not introduce any evidence; and his statement denying his guilt was evidently rejected by the jury. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hendrix v. State, 11 S.E.2d 51, 63 Ga. App. 304, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 78 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).
11 S.E.2d 51 (Hendrix v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.