Hendrix v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hendrix v. State

11 S.E.2d 51, 63 Ga. App. 304, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 78

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 3, 1940

Docket28507.

StatusPublished

This text of 11 S.E.2d 51 (Hendrix v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hendrix v. State, 11 S.E.2d 51, 63 Ga. App. 304, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 78 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was tried on an indictment charging him with rape, and was convicted of an assault with intent to rape. His motion for new trial (consisting of the general grounds only) was overruled, and he excepted to that judgment. The evidence for the State amply authorized the verdict. The defendant did not introduce any evidence; and his statement denying his guilt was evidently rejected by the jury. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was tried on an indictment charging him with rape, and was convicted of an assault with intent to rape. His motion for new trial (consisting of the general grounds only) was overruled, and he excepted to that judgment. The evidence for the State amply authorized the verdict. The defendant did not introduce any evidence; and his statement denying his guilt was evidently rejected by the jury. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 S.E.2d 51, 63 Ga. App. 304, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrix-v-state-gactapp-1940.