Hendrix v. State

144 S.E. 220, 38 Ga. App. 443, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 281
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 31, 1928
Docket19049, 19050
StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.E. 220 (Hendrix v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendrix v. State, 144 S.E. 220, 38 Ga. App. 443, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 281 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

In each of these cases the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the only special ground of the motion for a new trial was based upon alleged newly discovered evidence. That evidence, however, was cumulative and impeaching in its character, and it does not appear that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgments affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.E. 220, 38 Ga. App. 443, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrix-v-state-gactapp-1928.