Hendrix v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hendrix v. State

145 So. 501, 25 Ala. App. 296, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 3

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 10, 1933

Docket6 Div. 269.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 So. 501 (Hendrix v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hendrix v. State, 145 So. 501, 25 Ala. App. 296, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 3 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

All .questions apparent on this appeal are such as can be considered only when shown by a bill of exceptions, or in connection with a bill of exceptions, showing the evidence or the tendencies of the evidence adduced at the trial.

The record in this cause contains what purports to be a bill of exceptions, but it is not authenticated by the signature of the judge presiding at the trial, as the statute requires (Code 1923, § 6432).

In these circumstances, of which the court takes notice ex mero motu, the so-called bill of exceptions cannot be considered for any purpose. Sharpe v. Hughes et al., 202 Ala. 510, 80 So. 798.

It results that the judgment must be affirmed. And it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI