Hendrix v. Hunt
146 S.E. 897, 168 Ga. 81, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 74
This text of 146 S.E. 897 (Hendrix v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hendrix v. Hunt, 146 S.E. 897, 168 Ga. 81, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 74 (Ga. 1929).
Opinion
On conflicting evidence the judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction. The judgment of the court on which error was assigned did not rule upon the demurrer to the petition, and no question is presented as to the sufficiency of the petition.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ingram & LeGrand Lumber Co. v. McAllister
4 S.E.2d 558 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
146 S.E. 897, 168 Ga. 81, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrix-v-hunt-ga-1929.