Hendrix v. Hunt

146 S.E. 897, 168 Ga. 81, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 74
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 15, 1929·No. No. 6550·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

On conflicting evidence the judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction. The judgment of the court on which error was assigned did not rule upon the demurrer to the petition, and no question is presented as to the sufficiency of the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hendrix v. Hunt, 146 S.E. 897, 168 Ga. 81, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 74 (Ga. 1929).

146 S.E. 897 (Hendrix v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ingram & LeGrand Lumber Co. v. McAllister
4 S.E.2d 558 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)