Hendrix v. Harry's Cadillac Co.

16 S.E.2d 456, 220 N.C. 84, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 481
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 24, 1941·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

This is an action under C. S., 2306, to recover an amount of alleged usurious interest paid by the plaintiff to the defendants in a transaction involving the purchase and sale of a second-hand automobile, with deferred payments secured by conditional sale contract.

An examination of the evidence convinces us that the transaction involved was indeed a sale and not a loan, and therefore the cause of action alleged by the plaintiff is not sustained by the evidence. Note, 48 A. L. R., p. 1442; 57 A. L. R., p. 880; 91 A. L. R., p. 1105.

The judgment of the Superior Court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hendrix v. Harry's Cadillac Co., 16 S.E.2d 456, 220 N.C. 84, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 481 (N.C. 1941).

16 S.E.2d 456 (Hendrix v. Harry's Cadillac Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michigan National Bank v. Hanner
151 S.E.2d 579 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Carolina Industrial Bank v. Merrimon
132 S.E.2d 692 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Dillingham v. . Gardner
21 S.E.2d 898 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)