Hendrix v. Harry's Cadillac Co.

16 S.E.2d 456, 220 N.C. 84, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 481
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 24, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 16 S.E.2d 456 (Hendrix v. Harry's Cadillac Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendrix v. Harry's Cadillac Co., 16 S.E.2d 456, 220 N.C. 84, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 481 (N.C. 1941).

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

This is an action under C. S., 2306, to recover an amount of alleged usurious interest paid by the plaintiff to the defendants in a transaction involving the purchase and sale of a second-hand automobile, with deferred payments secured by conditional sale contract.

An examination of the evidence convinces us that the transaction involved was indeed a sale and not a loan, and therefore the cause of action alleged by the plaintiff is not sustained by the evidence. Note, 48 A. L. R., p. 1442; 57 A. L. R., p. 880; 91 A. L. R., p. 1105.

The judgment of the Superior Court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michigan National Bank v. Hanner
151 S.E.2d 579 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Carolina Industrial Bank v. Merrimon
132 S.E.2d 692 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Dillingham v. . Gardner
21 S.E.2d 898 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 S.E.2d 456, 220 N.C. 84, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrix-v-harrys-cadillac-co-nc-1941.