Hendrix v. CLARE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hendrix v. CLARE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

234 S.E.2d 861, 142 Ga. App. 6, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1451

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 14, 1977

Docket53475

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 234 S.E.2d 861 (Hendrix v. CLARE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hendrix v. CLARE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 234 S.E.2d 861, 142 Ga. App. 6, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1451 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

Appellant sued for payment of a commission allegedly due him by virtue of his arranging a sale of property owned by appellee. Appellant contends the *7 granting of appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was error. As we do not have before us a transcript of the evidence introduced on the trial, we must assume the court was correct in ruling that the evidence demanded the verdict for appellee. Greene v. McIntyre, 119 Ga. App. 296 (167 SE2d 203); Turner v. Watson, 139 Ga. App. 648 (229 SE2d 126). We affirm on that basis.

Submitted February 1, 1977 Decided April 14, 1977. Kenneth S. Stepp, Alex D. Williams, for appellant. Henson & Cheves, Cecil M. Cheves, L. Joel Collins, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Judge.

Appellant sued for payment of a commission allegedly due him by virtue of his arranging a sale of property owned by appellee. Appellant contends the *7 granting of appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was error. As we do not have before us a transcript of the evidence introduced on the trial, we must assume the court was correct in ruling that the evidence demanded the verdict for appellee. Greene v. McIntyre, 119 Ga. App. 296 (167 SE2d 203); Turner v. Watson, 139 Ga. App. 648 (229 SE2d 126). We affirm on that basis.

Submitted February 1, 1977 Decided April 14, 1977. Kenneth S. Stepp, Alex D. Williams, for appellant. Henson & Cheves, Cecil M. Cheves, L. Joel Collins, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 S.E.2d 861, 142 Ga. App. 6, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrix-v-clare-development-corporation-gactapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack