Hendrix (Jamal) Vs. State
This text of 479 P.3d 1005 (Hendrix (Jamal) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX, No. 81897 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. FEB 1 0 2021 EL1ZAVETH A. BROWI4 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By Ç •Yt)-4-1,1/4.6%.„. ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK r
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea and denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge. Appellant has filed a notice of voluntary withdrawal of this appeal. The motion is granted. Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'
Al4C4-0 J Stiglich Silver
'Given this order, appellant need not file a proof of service for the pro se notice filed on January 26, 2021. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Jainal Damon Hendrix Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
479 P.3d 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrix-jamal-vs-state-nev-2021.