Hendrickson v. Universal Winding Co.

8 R.I. Dec. 199
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedFebruary 4, 1932
DocketW. C. A. No. 1291
StatusPublished

This text of 8 R.I. Dec. 199 (Hendrickson v. Universal Winding Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendrickson v. Universal Winding Co., 8 R.I. Dec. 199 (R.I. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

DECISION.

WALSH, J.

This is a petition for relief under the ■ provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Petitioner was a molder employed in defendant’s foundry. While he was in the course of his employment, a fellow employee threw some water upon him. Petitioner grabbed his fellow employee by the arm and remonstrated with him for fooling. The fellow employee struck petitioner in the face and broke petitioner’s jaw. It is for the broken jaw and the injury resulting therefrom that the petitioner seeks relief from the employer.

It appeared in evidence that the employer had expressly forbidden fighting or horse-play among employees prior to above occurrence.

An injury by a fellow servant, unless it arises out of and in the course of employment of the petitioner, is not in our opinion a risk that the employer assumes. In this ease, an independent quarrel between two employees, in no way related to or connected with the employer’s business, was the cause of the injury to petitioner and we feel that the employer cannot be held responsible for the consequences of such a quarrel.

Petition for relief denied and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 R.I. Dec. 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrickson-v-universal-winding-co-risuperct-1932.