Hendrickson v. State

348 S.W.3d 185, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1239, 2011 WL 4369447
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 20, 2011
DocketED 96078
StatusPublished

This text of 348 S.W.3d 185 (Hendrickson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendrickson v. State, 348 S.W.3d 185, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1239, 2011 WL 4369447 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason Hendrickson (Movant) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 S.W.3d 185, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1239, 2011 WL 4369447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrickson-v-state-moctapp-2011.