Hendrickson v. Hendrickson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hendrickson v. Hendrickson

268 A.D. 1045, 52 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5427

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 2, 1945·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order denying his cross motion for an order further modifying the final judgment of separation herein, as heretofore modified by an order of this court [see 266 App. Div. 867, 1011], by reducing the amount of alimony payable thereunder from twenty-five dollars a week to five dollars a week, or, in the alternative, to have the matter referred to an official referee for a hearing. Order modified on the law and the facts by striking out the words “ is in all respects denied ” and in place thereof inserting a provision granting the motion to the extent of referring the matter to an official referee to hear the issues presented by the affidavits and to report, with his opinion, to Special Term. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The issues presented by the conflicting affidavits can best be determined by an oral hearing. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from an order denying his cross motion for an order further modifying the final judgment of separation herein, as heretofore modified by an order of this court [see 266 App. Div. 867, 1011], by reducing the amount of alimony payable thereunder from twenty-five dollars a week to five dollars a week, or, in the alternative, to have the matter referred to an official referee for a hearing. Order modified on the law and the facts by striking out the words “ is in all respects denied ” and in place thereof inserting a provision granting the motion to the extent of referring the matter to an official referee to hear the issues presented by the affidavits and to report, with his opinion, to Special Term. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The issues presented by the conflicting affidavits can best be determined by an oral hearing. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Hendrickson v. Hendrickson, 268 A.D. 1045, 52 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

268 A.D. 1045 (Hendrickson v. Hendrickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related