Hendrickson v. 20th Judicial District of Virginia

367 F. App'x 400
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2010·No. No. 09-2291·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John David Hendrickson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) for being frivolous and for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendrickson v. In the 20th Judicial Dish of Va., No. 1:09-cv-00563-CMH-IDD (E.D.Va. Sept. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hendrickson v. 20th Judicial District of Virginia, 367 F. App'x 400 (4th Cir. 2010).

367 F. App'x 400 (Hendrickson v. 20th Judicial District of Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)