Hendricks v. Wolff
9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hendricks v. Wolff. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 N.Y.S. 607 →
Opinion
We do not think that the demurrer in the case at har was frivolous. There are questions raised by the demurrer which require consideration, and the complaint upon inspection does not appear necessarily to be good.
In the case of Keteltas v. Myers (19 N. Y., 231), the complaint contained various allegations which are not to be found in the case under discussion.
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hendricks v. Wolff, 9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).
9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846 (Hendricks v. Wolff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keteltas v. . Myers
19 N.Y. 231 (New York Court of Appeals, 1859)