Hendricks v. Wolff

New York Supreme Court

Hendricks v. Wolff

9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846

DecidedJune 18, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846 (Hendricks v. Wolff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hendricks v. Wolff, 9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We do not think that the demurrer in the case at har was frivolous. There are questions raised by the demurrer which require consideration, and the complaint upon inspection does not appear necessarily to be good.

In the case of Keteltas v. Myers (19 N. Y., 231), the complaint contained various allegations which are not to be found in the case under discussion.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We do not think that the demurrer in the case at har was frivolous. There are questions raised by the demurrer which require consideration, and the complaint upon inspection does not appear necessarily to be good.

In the case of Keteltas v. Myers (19 N. Y., 231), the complaint contained various allegations which are not to be found in the case under discussion.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 N.Y. St. Rep. 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-wolff-nysupct-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack