Hendricks v. Walden
17 Johns. 438
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided March 31, 1819·Published·Cited by 15 cases
Opinion
being unanimously of opinion, that the decree of the Court of Chancery ought to be affirmed, it was, thereupon, Ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the decree of the Court of Chancery be affirmed ; and that the appellant pay to the respondents for Ms costs, &c.,and that the record be remitted, &c.
Decree of affirmance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hendricks v. Walden, 17 Johns. 438 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).
17 Johns. 438 (Hendricks v. Walden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Locust Bldg. Co.
299 F. 756 (Second Circuit, 1924)
Robertson v. Monroe
109 A. 495 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1920)
Nagle v. Wakey
43 N.E. 1079 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1896)
Nagle v. Wakey
59 Ill. App. 198 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)
Weiler v. Nemback
3 Silv. Ct. App. 145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Lampert v. Laclede Gas-Light Co.
14 Mo. App. 376 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1883)
Hollenbeck v. County of Winnebago
95 Ill. 148 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1880)
McCaffrey v. Hickey
66 Barb. 489 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
Austin v. . Goodrich
49 N.Y. 266 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Lawrence v. Bank of the Republic
3 Rob. 142 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1865)
Loeschigk v. Baldwin
1 Rob. 377 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1863)
Powers v. Graydon
10 Bosw. 630 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1863)
Peck v. Village of Batavia
32 Barb. 634 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Morey v. Town of Newfane
8 Barb. 645 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)