Hendricks v. Stepp

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 13, 2010
• Docket: 09-1851
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1851

ROBERT MASON HENDRICKS; JACQUELINE TAYLOR HENDRICKS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

ROBERT STEPP, Esquire; RHONDA HUNSINGER; MAURICE HOOD; JEANNIE WEINGARTH; MICHAEL TAYLOR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03299-CMC)

Submitted: December 22, 2009 Decided: January 13, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Mason Hendricks and Jacqueline Taylor Hendricks, Appellants Pro Se. Mark S. Barrow, William R. Calhoun, Jr., SWEENY, WINGATE & BARROW, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Katherine Dudley Helms, Christopher John Near, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Columbia, South Carolina; Janet Carol Brooks, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Mason Hendricks and Jacqueline Taylor Hendricks

appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate

judge’s recommendation, dismissing the Hendricks’s civil action

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and denying the

Hendricks’s motion to amend their complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendricks v.

Stepp, No. 3:08-cv-03299-CMC (D.S.C. filed July 22, 2009;

entered July 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED