Hendricks v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hendricks v. State

835 S.W.2d 575, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1454, 1992 WL 213099

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 1992·No. No. 61225·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The denial is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The denial is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

Hendricks v. State, 835 S.W.2d 575, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1454, 1992 WL 213099 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

835 S.W.2d 575 (Hendricks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.