Hendricks v. State
175 So. 2d 206, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168
Opinion
The appellant appeals from a trial court’s-denial without hearing of his motion for relief filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The order of the trial judge correctly held that appellant’s claim for relief was clearly refuted by the record. The order is affirmed upon authority of Sardinia v. State, Fla.1964, 168 So.2d 674; Ingrim v. State, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 805.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hendricks v. State, 175 So. 2d 206, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).
175 So. 2d 206 (Hendricks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hendricks v. State
183 So. 2d 210 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)