Hendricks v. State
This text of 175 So. 2d 206 (Hendricks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant appeals from a trial court’s-denial without hearing of his motion for relief filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The order of the trial judge correctly held that appellant’s claim for relief was clearly refuted by the record. The order is affirmed upon authority of Sardinia v. State, Fla.1964, 168 So.2d 674; Ingrim v. State, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 805.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 So. 2d 206, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-state-fladistctapp-1965.