Hendricks v. State

108 So. 3d 608, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 59, 2013 WL 362795, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 124
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 31, 2013·No. No. SC10-1275·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in Hendricks v. State, 34 So.3d 819 [609] (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss the review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur. PARIENTE and LABARGA, JJ., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hendricks v. State, 108 So. 3d 608, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 59, 2013 WL 362795, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 124 (Fla. 2013).

108 So. 3d 608 (Hendricks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Of Washington, Resp. v. Malcolm J. Fraser, App.
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2015