Hendricks v. State

108 So. 3d 608, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 59, 2013 WL 362795, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 124
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 2013
DocketNo. SC10-1275
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 108 So. 3d 608 (Hendricks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendricks v. State, 108 So. 3d 608, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 59, 2013 WL 362795, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 124 (Fla. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in Hendricks v. State, 34 So.3d 819 [609]*609(Fla. 1st DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss the review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur. PARIENTE and LABARGA, JJ., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Of Washington, Resp. v. Malcolm J. Fraser, App.
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 So. 3d 608, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 59, 2013 WL 362795, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-state-fla-2013.