Hendricks v. State ex rel. Huff

1 Ind. L. Rep. 565
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 14, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ind. L. Rep. 565 (Hendricks v. State ex rel. Huff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendricks v. State ex rel. Huff, 1 Ind. L. Rep. 565 (Ind. 1884).

Opinion

Opinion of the court by

Mr. Chief Justice Howk.

In this case Hiram K. Hendricks alone has appealed to this court from a judgment rendered by the court below against him, and one Lewis Foster, and in favor of the appellee’s relator, in a suit on a guardian’s bond. The record and files of the case show, that the appellant, Hendricks, has not served notice of his appeal on his co-defendant,• Foster, and filed the proof of such service with the clerk of this court, in conformity with the requirements of section 551 of the code, 2R. S., 1876, p. 239. Upon the ground of the appellant’s failure to comply with the express provisions of the statute, in respect to .such notice, the appellee’s relator has moved the court to dismiss this appeal. For the reason given, the motion must be sustained and the appeal dismissed accordingly. [566]*566Reeder v. Maranda, 55 Ind. 239; Pierson v. Hart, 64 Ind. 254; and Hammon v. Sexton, 69 Ind. 37.

Vande venter & Lacy, for appellant. B. F. Williams, for appellee.

The appeal is dismissed at the appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reeder v. Maranda
55 Ind. 239 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)
Pierson v. Hart
64 Ind. 254 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)
Hammon v. Sexton
69 Ind. 37 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ind. L. Rep. 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-state-ex-rel-huff-ind-1884.