Hendricks v. State ex rel. Huff

73 Ind. 482
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1881
DocketNo. 7729
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 73 Ind. 482 (Hendricks v. State ex rel. Huff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendricks v. State ex rel. Huff, 73 Ind. 482 (Ind. 1881).

Opinion

Howk, C. J.

— In this case, Hiram K. Hendricks alone has appealed to this court from a judgment rendered by the court below against him and one Lewis Foster, and in favor of the appellee’s relator, in a suit on a guardian’s bond. The record and files of the case show that the appellant, [483]*483Hendricks, has not served notice of his appeal on his co-•defendant, Foster, and filed the proof of such service with '.the clerk of this court, in conformity with the requirements ¡of section 551 of the code, 2 R. S. 1876, p. 239. Upon the ground of the appellant’s failure to comply with the express .provisions of the statute, in respect to such notice, the appellee’s relator has moved the court to dismiss this appeal. For the reason given, the motion must be sustained and the .appeal dismissed accordingly. Reeder v. Maranda, 55 Ind. 239 ; Pierson v. Hart, 64 Ind. 254; and Hammon v. Sexton, 69 Ind. 37.

The appeal is dismissed, at the appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Young v. Cunningham
101 Ind. 461 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Dobbins v. Baker
80 Ind. 52 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Ind. 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-state-ex-rel-huff-ind-1881.