Hendricks v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Hendricks v. Keisling

815 P.2d 207, 311 Or. 483, 1991 Ore. LEXIS 45

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 18, 1991

DocketSC S38069; SC S38095; SC S38110

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 815 P.2d 207 (Hendricks v. Keisling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hendricks v. Keisling, 815 P.2d 207, 311 Or. 483, 1991 Ore. LEXIS 45 (Or. 1991).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM

This proceeding concerns challenges to a ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. ORS 250.085(1). The ballot title certified by the Attorney General is set forth in the appendix. We have considered the challenges. The ballot title certified by the Attorney General is approved and certified to the Secretary of State. This decision shall become effective pursuant to ORAP 11.30(10).

[487]*487APPENDIX

BALLOT TITLE CERTIFIED BY ATTORNEY GENERAL

AMENDS CONSTITUTION TO SAY THAT LAWS MAY REGULATE CAMPAIGN FINANCING

QUESTION: Shall the Constitution be amended to say that laws may be adopted to regulate election campaign •financing?

SUMMARY: This measure would amend the state constitution. The new language would read as follows: “The people, as provided in this Constitution, or the Legislative Assembly may enact laws regulating the financing of election campaigns.” This language would be added to the section of the state constitution that now allows regulation of elections.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI