Hendricks v. Jackson
This text of 77 S.E. 816 (Hendricks v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under the conflicting evidence in this case, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant the interlocutory injunction for which the plaintiff prayed.
2. In addition to the order denying the interlocutory injunction, the presiding judge filed a separate opinion in which he discussed the law and the evidence and 'the reasons affecting his mind in the refusal of the injunction. These statements did not amount to final adjudications, but merely gave the reasons of the presiding judge; and inasmuch as his judgment was not erroneous, whether or not all of his reasoning was sound, a reversal is not required.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 S.E. 816, 139 Ga. 604, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-jackson-ga-1913.