Hendricks v. Jackson

77 S.E. 816, 139 Ga. 604, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 540
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 11, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 77 S.E. 816 (Hendricks v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendricks v. Jackson, 77 S.E. 816, 139 Ga. 604, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 540 (Ga. 1913).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Under the conflicting evidence in this case, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant the interlocutory injunction for which the plaintiff prayed.

2. In addition to the order denying the interlocutory injunction, the presiding judge filed a separate opinion in which he discussed the law and the evidence and 'the reasons affecting his mind in the refusal of the injunction. These statements did not amount to final adjudications, but merely gave the reasons of the presiding judge; and inasmuch as his judgment was not erroneous, whether or not all of his reasoning was sound, a reversal is not required.

Judgment affirmed.

Beelc, J., absent. The other Justice's concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Mayor &C. of Savannah
76 S.E.2d 796 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Poole v. Arnold
2 S.E.2d 83 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Coker v. City of Atlanta
198 S.E. 74 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Babb v. McKinnon
196 S.E. 488 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
White v. Cook
156 S.E. 657 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Dunaway v. Gore
138 S.E. 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 816, 139 Ga. 604, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-jackson-ga-1913.