Hendricks v. Hargrave

Indiana Supreme Court

Hendricks v. Hargrave

52 Ind. 327

DecidedMay 15, 1876

StatusPublished

This text of 52 Ind. 327 (Hendricks v. Hargrave) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hendricks v. Hargrave, 52 Ind. 327 (Ind. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Pettit, J.

The appellee brought suit for a mandate :against the appellant, to compel him to issue a commission to the appellee as judge of the Criminal Circuit Court of Vanderburgh county. A demurrer for want of sufficient facts to the complaint was overruled, and this ruling alone is .assigned for error. No exception was taken to this ruling, .and, therefore, no question is presented in the record for ■our consideration.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettit, J.

The appellee brought suit for a mandate :against the appellant, to compel him to issue a commission to the appellee as judge of the Criminal Circuit Court of Vanderburgh county. A demurrer for want of sufficient facts to the complaint was overruled, and this ruling alone is .assigned for error. No exception was taken to this ruling, .and, therefore, no question is presented in the record for ■our consideration.

The judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Ind. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-hargrave-ind-1876.