Hendricks v. Galloway

Fourth Circuit

Hendricks v. Galloway

431 F. App'x 219

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2011·No. No. 11-6358·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Edward Hendricks appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate the court’s previous order denying relief, on Hendricks’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendricks v. Galloway, No. 3:03-cv-00740-DCN, 2011 WL 585970 (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Edward Hendricks appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate the court’s previous order denying relief, on Hendricks’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendricks v. Galloway, No. 3:03-cv-00740-DCN, 2011 WL 585970 (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hendricks v. Galloway, 431 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

431 F. App'x 219 (Hendricks v. Galloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related