Hendricks v. Dallum

1 Tenn. 427
CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity
DecidedMay 6, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Tenn. 427 (Hendricks v. Dallum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendricks v. Dallum, 1 Tenn. 427 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1809).

Opinion

Overton, J.

Injunctions may be granted quia timet; may be obtained before or after suit. If after suit, and before plea, the suit at law may proceed to issue, but must stop there. If after issue, it proceeds to judgment, and there stops, until the determination of the suit in equity. Whether it be competent to this court, in any ejectment or caveat cause, to set aside an injunction, as having been improvidently obtained, I will not undertake to say, it not being necessary. After the decision, that a younger grant could be relied on in a court of law, it was soon determined in the case of Kerr vs. Porter, in equity, that equity had jurisdiction in such cases, as well as a court of law. The jurisdiction of the two courts was concurrent. (a)

The other judges concurred.
(a)

See 3 Bro. C. C. 218. Hardin's R. 461 Wilson vs. Killcannon. Ante p. 201

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chadwell v. Jordan
2 Tenn. Ch. R. 635 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tenn. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-dallum-tennsuperct-1809.