Hendricks v. Casina

673 F. App'x 335
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 19, 2017
DocketNo. 16-6917
StatusPublished

This text of 673 F. App'x 335 (Hendricks v. Casina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendricks v. Casina, 673 F. App'x 335 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek Hendricks appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants summary judgment on Hendricks’ 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint, in which Hendricks alleged an Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical condition, and denying Hendricks’ postjudgment motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hendricks v. Casina, No. 5:13-ct-03090-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2015 & June 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 F. App'x 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-casina-ca4-2017.