Hendricks v. Carpenter

1 Abb. Pr. 213, 2 Rob. 625
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJanuary 15, 1864
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Abb. Pr. 213 (Hendricks v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendricks v. Carpenter, 1 Abb. Pr. 213, 2 Rob. 625 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1864).

Opinion

McCunn, J.

In this ease a motion was made to open an inquest and set aside a judgment entered at trial term.

After a careful inspection of the entire case, and after examining the láw, I find that it is quite out of my power to grant the relief claimed.

The action was for a money demand on contract. The parties reside within the jurisdiction of the court, and are fully under its control.

This being so, and more than two years having elapsed since the perfection, entry and notice of the judgment upon the defendant’s attorney, the 174th section of the Code steps in and precludes me from interfering.

Other points were raised in the case, but, as this is the principal and overshadowing one, I refrain from saying more in the premises. >

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Abb. Pr. 213, 2 Rob. 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-carpenter-nysuperctnyc-1864.