Hendricks v. Botten
This text of 404 P.2d 242 (Hendricks v. Botten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree setting aside a conveyance made in fraud of creditors. The only issue [119]*119is whether the original judgment under which the plaintiffs in this case claim is subject to collateral attack.
Two defects are alleged as bases for an attack upon the creditors’ original judgment: (1) The original action was one in the nature of replevin and the jury verdict awarded money damages without mentioning the right of possession. (2) The original judgment allowed interest although the verdict was silent upon the subject of interest. No appeal was taken from the original judgment.
It is not necessary to decide whether either of the two alleged defects could have been reviewed upon appeal, for it is clear that neither, even if shown to be a defect, could render a judgment void upon collateral attack. Van Natta v. Columbia County, 236 Or 214, 217, 388 P2d 18 (1963).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
404 P.2d 242, 241 Or. 118, 1965 Ore. LEXIS 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendricks-v-botten-or-1965.