Hendricks v. Bair

96 F. App'x 885

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 12, 2004
• Docket: 01-2006
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2006

In Re: CARL C. HENDRICKS, JR.,

Debtor.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CARL C. HENDRICKS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAROLYN BAIR,

Defendant - Appellee, and

KEVIN CAMPBELL,

Trustee.

No. 02-2298

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

versus CAROLYN BAIR,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-00-3135-2-18; BK-99-80230)

Submitted: March 26, 2004 Decided: May 12, 2004

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl C. Hendricks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert E. Austin, Jr., ROBERT E. AUSTIN, JR., P.A., Leesburg, Florida; Michael Conrady, CAMPBELL LAW FIRM, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In No. 01-2006, Carl C. Hendricks, Jr., appeals from the

district court’s order which dismissed as untimely his appeal from

the bankruptcy court’s consent order entered May 12, 2002, and

denied his motion to conduct further discovery during the pendency

of his appeal. In No. 02-2298, Hendricks appeals from the

magistrate judge’s order enforcing a settlement entered into

between the parties in open court.* We have reviewed the record

and found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court and magistrate judge.

Hendricks v. Bair, Nos. CA-00-3135-2-18; BK-99-80230 (D.S.C.

July 31, 2002; Oct. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 3 -