Hendrick v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hendrick v. Foster

123 S.E. 33, 32 Ga. App. 347, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 386

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 14, 1924

Docket15405

StatusPublished

This text of 123 S.E. 33 (Hendrick v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hendrick v. Foster, 123 S.E. 33, 32 Ga. App. 347, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the overruling of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, which contained only the usual general grounds. Erom a study of the record it cannot be held that the verdict was not supported by any evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the overruling of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, which contained only the usual general grounds. Erom a study of the record it cannot be held that the verdict was not supported by any evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 S.E. 33, 32 Ga. App. 347, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrick-v-foster-gactapp-1924.