Hendrick v. Carolina Central Railroad

4 S.E. 184, 98 N.C. 431
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 4 S.E. 184 (Hendrick v. Carolina Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendrick v. Carolina Central Railroad, 4 S.E. 184, 98 N.C. 431 (N.C. 1887).

Opinion

Merrimon, J.

The order appealed from is interlocutory, and no appeal lay at this stage of the proceeding from it. Upon the coming in of the report of the commissioners, ap *432 propriate exceptions thereto may be filed by either or both parties, raising all questions affecting their respective rights involved, and upon the settlement of the same and final judgment of the Court, either or both parties may assign error, and then appeal to this Court, bringing up for review all errors assigned in the record at any stage of the proceeding after it began.

This case is in all material respects like Telegraph Co. v. The Railroad Co., 83 N. C., 420; Commissioners v. Cook, 86 N. C., 18; Railroad Co. v. Warren, 92 N. C., 620.

They settle the course of practice in such proceeding as the present one, and sufficiently state the reasons for it.

That the defendant broadly denies the plaintiff’s alleged rights and grievances, and the parties agreed upon the facts, could not give the right of appeal at the present stage of the the proceeding, because the order appealed from was nevertheless interlocutory, and an appeal from the final judgment would bring up all questions arising in the course of the proceeding,, without denying or impairing any substantial rights of the defendant.

The order appealed from is very different from that in the similar case of Click v. The Railroad Co., decided at the present term ; in the latter the Court denied the motion for ah order appointing commissioners, and dismissed the proceeding, thus putting an end to the right of the plaintiff therein, and therefore an appeal lay in that case. Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hyman v. . Edwards
7 S.E.2d 700 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Sneed v. State Highway Commission
138 S.E. 350 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Ketchum Coal Co. v. Pleasant Valley Coal Co.
168 P. 86 (Utah Supreme Court, 1917)
Bradshaw v. Citizens National Bank
90 S.E. 789 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Graded School Trustees of Elizabeth City v. Hinton
71 S.E. 1087 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
Burlington & Colorado Railroad v. Colorado Eastern Railroad
45 Colo. 222 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1909)
R. R. v. . R. R.
61 S.E. 683 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Johnson City Southern Railway Co. v. South & Western Railroad
148 N.C. 59 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Holly Shelter Railroad v. Newton
45 S.E. 549 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)
Albemarle Steam Navigation Co. v. Worrell
45 S.E. 466 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)
Southern Railway Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
179 U.S. 641 (Supreme Court, 1901)
R. R. v. . King
34 S.E. 541 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
Cape Fear & Yadkin Valley Railway Co. v. King
125 N.C. 454 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
Southern Ry. Co. v. Postal Tel. Cable Co.
93 F. 393 (Fourth Circuit, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 S.E. 184, 98 N.C. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrick-v-carolina-central-railroad-nc-1887.