Hendrick v. Booth

Fourth Circuit

Hendrick v. Booth

654 F. App'x 136

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 14, 2016·No. No. 15-8024·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[137] • Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larnell Hendrick appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendrick v. Booth, No. 8:14-cv-04021-TDC, 2015 WL 8055172 (D.Md. Dec. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[137] • Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larnell Hendrick appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendrick v. Booth, No. 8:14-cv-04021-TDC, 2015 WL 8055172 (D.Md. Dec. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hendrick v. Booth, 654 F. App'x 136 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

654 F. App'x 136 (Hendrick v. Booth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related