Hendrick v. Bishop

640 F. App'x 259
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2016·No. No. 15-7745·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larnell Hendrick seeks to appeal the district court’s order resolving several of Hendrick’s claims in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Hendrick seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hendrick v. Bishop, 640 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2016).

640 F. App'x 259 (Hendrick v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. United States
S.D. West Virginia, 2019