Hendrick v. Bishop

640 F. App'x 259
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 2016
DocketNo. 15-7745
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 640 F. App'x 259 (Hendrick v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendrick v. Bishop, 640 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larnell Hendrick seeks to appeal the district court’s order resolving several of Hendrick’s claims in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Hendrick seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hernandez v. United States
S.D. West Virginia, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
640 F. App'x 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendrick-v-bishop-ca4-2016.