Hendon v. Baroya

320 F. App'x 717

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Footnotes

•

**

Carlos Hendon, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s determination that a prisoner failed to exhaust available administrative remedies, and review for clear error its findings of fact. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because Hendon failed to submit any evidence demonstrating that he properly exhausted prison grievance procedures. See id. at 1119-20 (explaining that failure to exhaust administrative remedies is subject to an unenumerated Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b) motion, and the court may look beyond the pleadings and decide disputed issues of fact).

Hendon’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.