Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hendley v. Sirmons

Hendley v. Sirmons

71 S.E. 492, 9 Ga. App. 408, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 581
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 7, 1911
Docket3245
StatusPublished

This text of 71 S.E. 492 (Hendley v. Sirmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hendley v. Sirmons, 71 S.E. 492, 9 Ga. App. 408, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 581 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Powell, J.

Inasmuch as the magistrate’s answer (unexeepted to so far as this point is concerned) failed to verify tlie allegation in the petition for certiorari that a final judgment of the nature alleged had been rendered, the judge of the superior court did not err in dismissing the certiorari, irrespective of the correctness of the grounds upon which he based his ruling. Landrum v. Moss, 1 Ga. App. 216 (6), (57 S. E. 965). However, he seems to have made a proper disposition óf the matter, irrespective of this technicality. Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari; from Berrien superior court— Judge Idiomas. February 14, 1911. Hendñcls £ Christian, for plaintiff in error. • Alexander £ Cary, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Landrum v. Moss
57 S.E. 965 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 S.E. 492, 9 Ga. App. 408, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hendley-v-sirmons-gactapp-1911.